

Search by job, company or skills

Enterprise context
The company operates managed accommodation and resident services for students through properties held under varied commercial arrangements. The operating promise combines safe premises, fair contracting, reliable utilities, food and housekeeping coordination, community management, complaint resolution and appropriate safeguarding. Demand is seasonal, but lease and staffing obligations may continue throughout the year.
The Board is preparing the enterprise for institutional and public-market scrutiny. Occupancy alone does not reveal economic health: a full property may remain unattractive after lease guarantees, fit-out amortisation, utilities, concessions, bad debts, security, maintenance and resident acquisition costs. Similarly, strong satisfaction scores can conceal serious unresolved incidents if complaints are poorly classified. The Board seeks an Independent Director who can link resident welfare, property-level cash economics and accountable growth.
Core Board mandate
The Director will oversee resident safety, safeguarding, deposits and advances, property contracting, unit economics, food and vendor governance, data privacy, complaint handling, expansion gates and IPO metrics. The appointee should challenge growth based on signed beds where opening readiness, local capability, regulatory status or downside lease economics are incomplete.
This is not a conventional real-estate seat. The company's reputation is created daily through frontline conduct and response during illness, harassment, infrastructure failure, fire, food-safety concerns and family escalation. The Director must ensure that operating design reflects the vulnerability and expectations of residents living away from home.
Strategic and governance agenda
Board decisions requiring independent judgment
The Director will contribute to master leases, new property clusters, long-duration institutional arrangements, acquisitions, resident-financing partnerships, central food operations, technology platforms, property exits and timing of the proposed IPO.
Each property proposal should show base and downside occupancy, achievable pricing, concession assumptions, fixed commitments, capex, opening schedule, break-even cash, resident-safety readiness and exit cost. The Board should reject proposals that require perfect occupancy or deferred maintenance to meet returns.
Resident-risk and IPO assurance
The Board dashboard should report sellable and revenue-generating occupancy; property contribution; lease cover; deposits and refund ageing; maintenance backlog; safety exceptions; emergency response; safeguarding allegations; food and water incidents; complaint severity and closure; staff and vendor screening; concessions; bad debt; audit findings; and IPO-remediation milestones.
Internal audit should include surprise property inspections, deposit reperformance, resident-file sampling, complaint review, access-log testing, vendor payroll and licence checks, property-contract compliance and occupancy-to-revenue reconciliation. Serious resident harm must have an escalation path outside local commercial management.
Job ID: 153847109